|Legal
Legal research you can cite in court.
Multi-agent consensus verification. Every citation deterministically checked against CourtListener's 10M+ database. Every holding independently cross-examined.
The Truth About Legal AI
Single-model legal AI hallucinates up to 33% of the time.
Stanford RegLab (Magesh et al., 2025) tested every major legal AI product. Westlaw's AI-Assisted Research hallucinated 33% of citations. Lexis+ AI: 17%. These are not fringe products—they serve the majority of practicing US attorneys.
The 5 Categories of Error
The Root Cause ArchitectureSingle-model RAG places the burden of truth on one system. One model retrieves. One model generates. One model hallucinates. The errors are systematic, not random.
The Architecture Standard
Comparing Crebral against incumbent legal tech platforms reveals structural advantages that single-model platforms cannot match.
| Capability Core | Crebral Legal | Westlaw CoCounsel | Lexis+ AI | Harvey |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-model consensus | 6 providers | Single model | Single model | Single model |
| Citation verification | Deterministic DB | Proprietary | Proprietary | None |
| Holding cross-check | 2 independent LLMs | None | None | None |
| Adversarial review | Automated | None | None | None |
| Audit trail | Full transparency | Black box | Black box | Black box |
| Data source | Open (CourtListener) | Proprietary lock-in | Proprietary lock-in | N/A |
| Hallucination rate | <6% (POC) | ~33% (Stanford) | ~17% (Stanford) | Unknown |
Multi-model consensus
Citation verification
Holding cross-check
Adversarial review
Audit trail
Data source
Hallucination rate
Deterministic Verification Architecture
The 7-Stage Pipeline
Every query passes through seven independent verification stages. No stage trusts the previous one's output. This is the only way to eliminate hallucination.
Case Search
CourtListener's database of 10M+ federal and state court opinions, spanning 471 jurisdictions.
Independent Research
6 AI providers research your question in parallel. They cannot see each other's work.
Citation Verification
Every citation is checked against the database. Deterministic lookup, not AI opinion.
Holding Cross-Check
Two independent LLMs from different families extract and compare the actual holding.
Good Law Analysis
Citation graph traversal flags overruled, reversed, or negatively treated authority.
Consensus Computation
Cross-agent agreement scored. Citations from 2+ agents classified as agreed.
Adversarial Review
A devil's advocate AI challenges the consensus. What would opposing counsel cite?
The Engine of Consensus
When 4+ agents from different LLM families agree on a legal conclusion, the possibility of correlated hallucination plummets. Independent analysis creates unshakeable confidence.
Platform Utilities
Built for precision drafting.
Citation-heavy motions are our sweet spot. Where precedent dictates outcome, Crebral provides the verification.
Motion for Summary Judgment
High VolumeThe most research-intensive pleading in litigation. Get verified citations with consensus scoring in 60 seconds.
Motion to Dismiss
Core UseChallenge the legal basis with cross-verified authority from multiple AI providers.
Motion to Compel
DiscoveryBack your discovery arguments with binding precedent, automatically shepardized.
Motion in Limine
Trial PrepExclude evidence with properly verified case law and good-law analysis.
Absolute Data Sanctity
SOC 2 compliant. Data never used for model training. Full audit trail for regulatory compliance.
Row Level Security
Every query is DB-scoped to your organization. Complete infrastructure isolation.
End-to-End Encryption
Research flows and results encrypted in transit and at rest. Your work product is yours alone.
Immutable Audit Trail
Every citation checked, every holding verified is logged. Complete compliance trail.
Start researching
with confidence.
3 free queries. No credit card required. Experience the power of the complete 7-stage verification pipeline today.